Defendant/appellant Dante Carlo Ciraolo appeals his conviction of cultivation of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11358) following his plea of guilty, contending the trial court erred in failing to suppress the evidence seized during a search of his residence. The search was conducted pursuant to a warrant obtained on the basis of information gathered in a
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. CIRAOLO
Docket No. A026048.
161 Cal.App.3d 1081 (1984)
208 Cal. Rptr. 93
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DANTE CARLO CIRAOLO, Defendant and Appellant.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 20, 1984.
November 20, 1984.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Pamela H. Duncan, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, and Philip H. Pennypacker for Defendant and Appellant.
John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Eugene W. Kaster and Laurence K. Sullivan, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
