1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 321 S.E.2d
  5. 321 S.E.2d 920 (1984)
 

STANLEY v. NATIONWIDE MUT. INS. CO.

No. 8316SC1181.

321 S.E.2d 920 (1984)

Donald Wayne STANLEY and South Carolina Insurance Company v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 6, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce W. Huggins, Lumberton, for plaintiff-appellee South Carolina Ins. Co.

I. Murchison Biggs, Lumberton, for defendant-appellant Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

EAGLES, Judge.

Appellant Nationwide has violated Rule 28(b)(5), Rules of Appellate Procedure in that it failed to set out its argument in its brief in the form of questions immediately followed by a reference to the assignments of error and exceptions pertinent to the questions. By application of Rule 28, Nationwide has abandoned its entire appeal. However, due to the serious questions presented on appeal and the brevity of the record, we are persuaded, in the interest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases