1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 598 F.Supp.
  5. 598 F.Supp. 642 (1984)
 

ROSENBERG v. CLEARY, GOTTLIEB, STEEN & HAMILTON

No. 84 Civ. 3974 (RWS).

598 F.Supp. 642 (1984)

Louis L. ROSENBERG and The Cherry Pike Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. CLEARY, GOTTLIEB, STEEN AND HAMILTON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

November 19, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lindenbaum & Young, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiffs; Jack L. Glasser, Lawrence, N.Y., of counsel.

Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, New York City, pro se; George Weisz, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen and Hamilton ("Cleary Gottlieb"), a prominent and wellknown law firm and a defendant to this action, has moved under Rule 12(b)6 of the Fed.R.Civ.P. to dismiss the complaint as to it and for attorney's fees and costs. Plaintiffs Louis Rosenberg and Cherry Pike Corporation (collectively "Cherry Pike") have cross-moved for leave to amend their complaint. The complaint, alleging antitrust violations as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases