RULIEN v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION

84-AB-252; CA A32301.

690 P.2d 530 (1984)

70 Or.App. 703

Lawrence J. RULIEN, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION for the State of Oregon and Carlton Company, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 7, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Mayfield, III Estacada, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

No appearance for respondents.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

Claimant appeals an Employment Appeals Board decision that he was not eligible for unemployment compensation. Because EAB did not explain adequately why it rejected the referee's credibility findings, we reverse and remand for reconsideration.

The primary issue in this case is whether claimant was sufficiently available for work.1 During the weeks at issue, he was enrolled as a full-time student, but he maintained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases