1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 595 F.Supp.
  5. 595 F.Supp. 622 (1984)
 

H.B. FULLER CO. v. NATIONAL STARCH & CHEMICAL CORP.

Civ. A. No. 80-454-JLL.

595 F.Supp. 622 (1984)

H.B. FULLER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL STARCH & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

September 27, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul E. Crawford of Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, Del., Alan G. Carlson of Merchant, Gould, Smith, Edell, Welter & Schmidt, P.A., Minneapolis, Minn., and Susan F. Marrinan of H.B. Fuller Co., St. Paul, Minn., of counsel, for plaintiff.

Peter M. Sieglaff of Potter Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Del., and Herbert F. Schwartz, David J. Lee, and Richard A. Inz of Fish & Neave, New York City, of counsel, for defendant.

OPINION

LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.

This patent case is before the Court on the defendant's motion for summary judgment and, in the alternative, for a separate trial on the two issues discussed in its summary judgment brief. (Docket Item ["D.I."] 157.) Because there are unresolved factual issues in the case and because there appears to be little merit in bifurcating trial, the defendant's alternative motion will be denied.

I. FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases