MANLY v. MANLY


669 S.W.2d 537 (1984)

Tacie B. MANLY, Movant, v. Samuel MANLY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

May 10, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald L. Gulick, Burbank & Gulick, Louisville, for movant.

Frank E. Haddad, Jr., Louisville, for respondent.


OPINION OF THE COURT

The question on review is whether the payment of the fee required by CR 76.42(2)(a)(i) is a prerequisite to the filing of a Notice of Appeal.

The movant deposited in the circuit court clerk's office a Notice of Appeal from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court on the last day permitted by CR 73.02(1)(a). In accordance with a practice available in the Jefferson Circuit Court, movant did not deliver the Notice of Appeal to the clerk...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases