1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 591 F.Supp.
  5. 591 F.Supp. 615 (1984)
 

GOLDSBY v. CELOTEX CORP.

No. 83-1376-CV-W-1.

591 F.Supp. 615 (1984)

Jo Ann GOLDSBY, Plaintiff, v. The CELOTEX CORPORATION, Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Raymark Industries, Inc.; Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.; Fibreboard Corporation; Keene Corporation; GAF Corporation; Nicolet, Inc.; H.K. Porter Company, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D.

August 8, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brent M. Rosenthal, Fredrick M. Baron & Assoc., Dallas, Tex., William H. Pickett, Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

William A. Lynch, Blackwell, Sanders, Matheny, Weary & Lombardi, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant Keene Corp.

James Borthwick, Blackwell, Sanders, Matheny, Weary & Lombardi, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant Fibreboard.

Theodore J. Furry, Birmingham & Furry, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant Nicolet.

William H. Woodson, Spencer, Fane, Britt & Browne, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant GAF.

Jeff O'Connor, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant Eagle-Picher.

Truman K. Eldridge, Jr., Dietrick, Davis, Dicus, Rowland, Schmitt & Gorman, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant Owens-Illinois.

Kenneth O. Smith, Knipmeyer, McCann, Fish & Smith, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant H.K. Porter Co.

John A. Koepke, Morris, Larson, King, Stamper & Bold, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant Raymark.

Michael J. Jerde, Morrison, Hecker, Curtis, Kuder & Parrish, Overland Park, Kan., for defendant Celotex.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDERS DENYING DEFENDANTS' ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

JOHN W. OLIVER, Senior District Judge.

I.

This case pends on defendants' joint motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment. That motion and the suggestions in support and opposition were filed pursuant to Orders entered March 16, 1984 after a discovery conference had been conducted in this case.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases