FMC CORP. v. SPURLIN

Civ. A. No. 83-906.

596 F.Supp. 609 (1984)

FMC CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. William V. SPURLIN, Syn-Energy Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Eriez Manufacturing Co., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Division.

August 30, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald D. Hosier, Thomas G. Scavone, Hosier, Niro & Daleiden, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., R. Dennis Osterman, Berkman, Ruslander, Pohl, Liber & Engel, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

James R. Walczak, Edward W. Goebel, Jr., MacDonald, Illig, Jones & Britton, Erie, Pa., for Eriez.

Walter J. Blenko, Jr., Buell, Blenko, Ziesenheim & Beck, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Spurlin/Syn-Energy.


OPINION

SIMMONS, District Judge.

I. Background.

This case involves the protection of intellectual property: a trade secret. The plaintiff is FMC Corporation. Through its predecessor companies and its Material Handling Division (MHE), located in Homer City, Pennsylvania, FMC has been engaged in the business of designing, manufacturing and selling vibratory feeding equipment1 since the 1930s.

The defendant, William...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases