UNITED STATES v. RUBBISH REMOVAL, INC.

Nos. 83-CR-128, 84-CR-72.

602 F.Supp. 595 (1984)

UNITED STATES of America, v. RUBBISH REMOVAL, INC.; Onondaga Environmental Systems, Inc.; Leaseway Haulers, Inc.; A & T Haulers, Inc.; Ace Sanitary Haulers, Inc.; Raite Rubbish Removal Corp.; Feher Rubbish Removal, Inc.; L. Michael Blumin; Joseph Tripoli, Senior; Joseph Tripoli, Junior; Francis Schrader; Thomas O'Connor, Senior; and Winfred Tousley, Defendants. UNITED STATES of America, v. John MAGGIO, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

As Amended February 11, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

U.S. Dept. of Justice Antitrust Division, New York City, for U.S.; Charles V. Reilly, Martha E. Gifford, Eric G. Waxman, III, New York City, of counsel.

Bond, Schoeneck & King, Syracuse, N.Y., for defendant Rubbish Removal, Inc.; John J. Dee, Syracuse, N.Y., of counsel.

Hiscock, Lee, Rogers, Henley & Barclay, Syracuse, N.Y., for defendant Onondaga Environmental Systems & Tripoli, Sr.; Richard K. Hughes, Syracuse, N.Y., of counsel.

Thompson, Hine & Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant, Leaseway Haulers; Leslie Jacobs, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel.

Eric Dadd, Attica, N.Y., for A & T Haulers.

Berger, Steingut, Weinwer, Fox & Stern, New York City, for defendant, Ace Sanitary Haulers; Lawrence I. Fox, New York City, of counsel.

Rivizzigno Aloi & DiLauro, Syracuse, N.Y., for defendants Raite Rubbish Removal & Feher Rubbish Removal; Anthony Rivizzigno, Ernest A. DelDuchetto, Syracuse, N.Y., of counsel.

Nottingham, Engel, Gordon, Kerr & Watt, Syracuse, N.Y., for defendant, L. Michael Blumin; Richard L. Engel, Syracuse, N.Y., of counsel.

DeFrancisco, Menkin & Brunetti, Syracuse, N.Y., for defendant, Joseph Tripoli, Jr.; Edward Menkin, Syracuse, N.Y., of counsel.

Joseph Fahey, Syracuse, N.Y., for defendant, Francis Schrader.

Emil Rossi, Syracuse, N.Y., for defendant, Thomas O'Connor, Sr.

McGraw & Wegerski, Syracuse, N.Y., for defendant Winfred Tousley; James R. McGraw, Syracuse, N.Y., of counsel.

Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, Syracuse, N.Y., for defendant Maggio; Gerald J. Mathews, Syracuse, N.Y., of counsel.


MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

McCURN, District Judge.

This is a criminal antitrust action in which the defendants are charged with conspiracy to allocate customers and rig bids and price quotations in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. Presently before the court is a motion by the defendants to dismiss the indictment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants contend that subject matter jurisdiction is lacking because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases