MINNESOTA MUT. FIRE & CAS. CO. v. RUDZINSKI

No. C3-84-96.

347 N.W.2d 848 (1984)

MINNESOTA MUTUAL FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Respondent, v. Constance RUDZINSKI, Appellant, Barbara Buck, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 15, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger A. Johnson, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Robert L. McCollum, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER and LANSING, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Constance Rudzinski appeals a judgment in favor of Minnesota Mutual Fire and Casualty Company entered on stipulated facts. Minnesota Mutual brought suit to recover benefits paid to Rudzinski and to a hospital on her behalf under the Minnesota No-Fault Act. The trial court concluded that the benefits had been paid as the result of a mutual mistake and that Minnesota Mutual was entitled to recover. Rudzinski contends that (1) the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases