1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Kan.
  4. 234 Kan.
  5. 234 Kan. 957 (1984)
 

STOLDT v. CITY OF TORONTO

No. 55,551

234 Kan. 957 (1984)

678 P.2d 153

FRED STOLDT, Appellant, v. CITY OF TORONTO, KANSAS, et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed February 18, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David H.M. Gray, of Gragert, Hiebert & Gray, of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellant.

Dale L. Pohl, of Forbes & Pohl, of Eureka, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellees City of Toronto, Kansas, Jim Snavely, and Bill Gulick.

Patrick L. Dougherty, of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellee Dalene Krkosska.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HERD, J.:

This is an action by appellant Fred Stoldt against the appellees City of Toronto and certain city council members arising from the firing of Stoldt as Toronto night watchman. Appellant sought damages alleging appellees breached the Open Meetings Act, violated his civil rights, and engaged in a civil conspiracy. Appellant also sought reinstatement as night watchman. The trial court granted summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases