1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 37 B.R.
  5. 37 B.R. 81 (1984)
 

IN RE RENNELS

Bankruptcy Nos. 38301364, 38301360, 38301369, 38301712, 38301820, 38301823, 38301863, 38301916, 18300373, 18300381, 18300383, 18300395, 18300402, 48300181 and 48300313.

37 B.R. 81 (1984)

In re Le Roy RENNELS, Debtor. In re Daryl Lamont MITCHELL, Debtor. In re John R. & Lillian J. CARTER, Debtor. In re Armond L. GOLDSTEIN, Debtor. In re Christopher & Carol BUSH, Debtor. In re Ronald E. CROSS, Debtor. In re Brent & Melody RIGGS, Debtor. In re Christopher & Whitney CHANDLER, Debtor. In re Timothy Ray HATLER, Debtor. In re Carl & Willie HARRIS, Debtor. In re Veachel & Donna CLINE, Debtor. In re Ernest & Gladys Faye CROSS, Debtor. In re Larry & Shirley PHILLIPS, Debtor. In re Ernest & Jackie Joe GILBERT, Debtor. In re Robert Allen MOON, Debtor.

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky.

January 20, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J.R. Bartholomew, Louisville, Ky., for Le Roy Rennels.

Donna N. Clements, Louisville, Ky., for Daryl Lamont Mitchell.

Ellen Friedman, Louisville, Ky., for John R. Carter (Lillian).

J. Gregory Joyner, Louisville, Ky., for Armond L. Goldstein.

Thomas A. McAdam, III, Louisville, Ky., for Christopher Bush (Carol).

Richard H. Shuster, Louisville, Ky., for Ronald E. Cross.

Jan C. Morris, Louisville, Ky., for Brent Riggs (Melody).

Donald L. White, Louisville, Ky., for Christopher Chandler (Whitney).

F. Hampton Moore, Jr., Bowling Green, Ky., for Timothy Hatler.

Lawrence F. Smith, Radcliff, Ky., for Carl Harris (Willie).

John W. Goodman, Munfordville, Ky., for Veachel Cline and Donna Cline.

Cabell D. Francis, Stanford, Ky., for Ernest Cross (Gladys).

Robert M. Alexander, Glasgow, Ky., for Larry Phillips (Shirley).

Stanley Suggs, Henderson, Ky., for Ernest Gilbert (Jackie).

Roger A. Cooper, Owensboro, Ky., for Robert Allen Moon.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MERRITT S. DEITZ, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

The likely effect of our opinion today will be to reduce by more than eighty per cent the number of discharge hearings in the Western District of Kentucky. Because we deal with a statute which apparently would deny that outcome, the result can obtain only with a lengthened reach of creative interpretation. To the extent that our exercise departs from what could be called a tradition of strict constructionism...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases