1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 691 P.2d
  5. 691 P.2d 489 (1984)
 

STATE v. FARKES

No. 82-09-2052; CA A30196; CA A30324.

691 P.2d 489 (1984)

71 Or.App. 155

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Michael Alan FARKES, Appellant. State of Oregon, Respondent, v. Consuelo Virginia Farkes, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 21, 1984.

Reconsideration Denied January 11, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Richard Lee Barton, Portland, argued the cause for appellant Michael Alan Farkes. With him on the brief were Barton & Loennig, Portland.

John S. Ransom, Portland, argued the cause for appellant Consuelo Farkes. With him on the brief were Ransom, Blackman & Simson, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.

NEWMAN, Judge.

In consolidated appeals, defendants seek reversal of their convictions. Both were charged in the same indictment with manufacture (Count I) and possession (Count II) of marijuana. ORS 475.992(1)(a) and ORS 475.992(4)(a). Michael Farkes (Michael) was convicted on both counts, but for sentencing purposes the court consolidated his conviction for possession with his conviction for manufacture. Consuelo Farkes (Consuelo) was convicted of possession but...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases