1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 598 F.Supp.
  5. 598 F.Supp. 575 (1984)
 

IN RE NAT. STUDENT MARKETING LITIGATION

MDL No. 105.

598 F.Supp. 575 (1984)

In re NATIONAL STUDENT MARKETING LITIGATION.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

November 9, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Duncan, Nathalie P. Gilfoyle, Robert C. Hacker, Jay D. Pedelty, Peabody, Lambert & Meyers, Washington, D.C., for Special Master.

Richard J. Braemer, Steven T. Stern, Braemer & Kessler, Philadelphia, Pa., for claimant Herbert M. Frank and Raymond Gold (Renselaar).

William M. Bradner, Jr., David R. Baker, Chadbourne, Parke, Whiteside & Wolff, New York City, for claimant George W. Schiele (Mailbag/M.I.I.).

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(Renselaar Corporation and Mailbag/M.I.I.)

BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge:

INTRODUCTION

On August 22 and 23, 1984, hearings were held to determine what valuations should be placed on Renselaar Corp. ("Renselaar") and Mailbag International, Inc. ("Mailbag") and its affiliate M.I.I. Services, Inc. ("M.I.I.") collectively referred to as Mailbag/M.I.I. At the hearings, the Court received and considered testimony,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases