HARTFORD ACC. & INDEM. CO. v. AETNA LIFE & CAS. INS. CO.


98 N.J. 18 (1984)

483 A.2d 402

HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 15, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarkson S. Fisher, Jr., argued the cause for appellant (Evans, Koelzer, Osborne & Kreitzman, attorneys).

Michael B. Oropollo argued the cause for respondent (Hoagland, Longo, Oropollo & Moran, attorneys; Jonathan Bubrow, on the brief).


PER CURIAM.

The Appellate Division affirmed the judgment in favor of defendant, Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance Company, substantially for the reasons set forth in the comprehensive written opinion of Judge Skillman. We granted plaintiff's petition for certification and likewise affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Skillman. His unpublished opinion reads in pertinent part as follows:

This case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases