MILLER v. RUTH'S OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.

No. 8326SC28.

313 S.E.2d 849 (1984)

Thomas E. MILLER v. RUTH'S OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Ruth's of South Carolina, Inc., B & H Foods, Inc., B & H, Inc. of Chester, Frances June Griffin, and Robert Griffin.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 17, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grier, Parker, Poe, Thompson, Bernstein, Gage & Preston by Gaston H. Gage and Debra L. Foster, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant.

Fairley, Hamrick, Monteith & Cobb by F. Lane Williamson and Dean Hamrick, Charlotte, for defendants-appellees.


JOHNSON, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the court erred in denying his request for attorneys' fees under G.S. 55-55(d), which provides that a court "may award" a successful plaintiff in a shareholders' derivative action "the reasonable expenses of maintaining the action, including reasonable attorneys' fees ...."

However, since this was not a shareholders' derivative action, we need not reach the arguments presented by plaintiff concerning the court's exercise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases