1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 158 Cal.App.3d
  5. 158 Cal.App.3d 997 (1984)
 

MAPLE PROPERTIES v. HARRIS

Docket No. 69423.

158 Cal.App.3d 997 (1984)

205 Cal. Rptr. 532

MAPLE PROPERTIES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BETTY H. HARRIS et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

August 1, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Levy & Norminton, Thomas M. Norminton, Leo D. Plotkin, Loeb & Loeb, Howard I. Friedman and Robin Meadow and Ervin, Cohen & Jessup and Richard Amerian for Plaintiff and Appellant and for Appellant's counsel Levy & Norminton.

Selvin & Weiner, Paul P. Selvin, James S. Tyre, Yusim, Stein & Hanger, Robert T. Hanger, Roger Bentley, Scott C. Haith and William M. Samoska for Defendants and Respondents.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

OPINION

LUI, Acting P.J. —

SUMMARY

In this appeal, we are asked to analyze the sufficiency of the allegations of a complaint filed by appellant, a real estate developer, against the respondents, private citizens who supported a referendum that repealed a city ordinance which would have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases