1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 352 N.W.2d
  5. 352 N.W.2d 797 (1984)
 

PETERSEN v. PETERSEN

No. C9-84-622.

352 N.W.2d 797 (1984)

Paul Mark PETERSEN, Appellant, v. Mary L. PETERSEN, Respondent,

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 7, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Mark Petersen, pro. se.

Richard J. Keenan; Thompson & Klaverkamp, Mary E. Senkus, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered, and decided by PARKER, P.J., and FOLEY and HUSPENI, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Petersen attempts to appeal from a dissolution judgment. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

FACTS

The judgment and decree dissolving the marriage of Paul and Mary Petersen was entered January 6, 1984. Appellant Paul Petersen, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals on April 4, 1984. The notice did not include proof of service on respondent Mary Petersen or the clerk of the trial court. Appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases