1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 662 S.W.2d
  5. 662 S.W.2d 476 (1984)
 

BULL v. BRANTNER

No. CA 83-69.

662 S.W.2d 476 (1984)

10 Ark.App. 229

Charles BULL, Appellant, v. Robert BRANTNER et ux, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I.

January 11, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Taylor, Vandergriff & Morris by William T. Morris, Fort Smith, for appellant.

Jack Skinner, Greenwood, for appellees.

GLAZE, Judge.

This appeal arises from a jury verdict of $10,000 in appellees' action for breach of an implied warranty of fitness and habitability on appellees' home. The appellant builder raises three issues.

Appellant first contends appellees did not give adequate notice of all of the claimed defects. We considered this same issue in Pickler v. Fisher, 7 Ark.App. 125, 644 S.W.2d 644

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases