1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 685 P.2d
  5. 685 P.2d 452 (1984)
 

EAST CTY. BARGAINING COUNCIL v. CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.

No. C-185-82; CA A27416.

685 P.2d 452 (1984)

69 Or.App. 47

EAST COUNTY BARGAINING COUNCIL, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 28JT, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 11, 1984.

Reconsideration Denied August 31, 1984.

Review Allowed October 30, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry H. Drummonds, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs were Robert D. Durham, and Kulongoski, Heid, Durham & Drummonds, Eugene.

Lester V. Smith, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With him on the brief were Douglas S. Parker, and Bullard, Korshoj, Smith & Jernstedt, P.C., Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and NEWMAN, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

East County Bargaining Council (council) is the exclusive representative under the Public Employe Collective Bargaining Act (PECBA), ORS 243.650 et seq., of teachers employed by Centennial School District No. 28JT. The council appeals and the district cross-appeals from an Employment Relations Board (ERB) order sustaining some and rejecting other allegations that the district's refusal to bargain about teacher evaluation procedures...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases