1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 586 F.Supp.
  5. 586 F.Supp. 551 (1984)
 

BAMDAD MECHANIC CO. v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Civ. A. No. 83-182 MMS.

586 F.Supp. 551 (1984)

BAMDAD MECHANIC CO., LTD., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

May 2, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving Morris, and Kevin Gross, Morris & Rosenthal, P.A., Wilmington, Del., of counsel: John H. Boone, Geoffrey P. Knudsen, and Michael R. Davisson, Boone, Knudsen & Martin, P.C., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

William H. Sudell, Jr., Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Del., James J. Garrett, Rochelle D. Alpert, and Richard G. Seeborg, Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

This contract dispute arose out of logistical difficulties generated by the 1978 revolution in Iran. The individual plaintiffs, Khosro Y. Jobrani and Parviz Jobrani, are both Iranian citizens who currently reside in California. The Jobrani brothers are the sole shareholders and directors of Bamdad Mechanic Co., Ltd. ("Bamdad"), an Iranian corporation and the corporate plaintiff in

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases