1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 458 N.E.2d
  5. 458 N.E.2d 668 (1984)
 

MEAD JOHNSON AND CO. v. OPPENHEIMER

No. 1-883A264.

458 N.E.2d 668 (1984)

MEAD JOHNSON AND COMPANY, an Indiana Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, v. John OPPENHEIMER, Plaintiff-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District.

January 16, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas O. Magan, Robert H. Brown, Kahn, Dees, Donovan & Kahn, Evansville, Robert J. Fair, Fair, Nixon & Stilwell, Princeton, for defendant-appellant.

David Jones, Bowers, Harrisoin, Kent & Miller, Evansville, Gregory F. Hahn, William T. Rosenbaum, Dillon, Hardamon & Cohen, Indianapolis, for plaintiff-appellee.

NEAL, Presiding Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the Gibson Circuit Court denying defendant-appellant, Mead Johnson and Company's (Mead Johnson), motion for summary judgment in an action brought by plaintiff-appellee, John Oppenheimer (Oppenheimer), who sought to recover damages for his discharge from employment.

We reverse.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

From 1972 through 1981 Oppenheimer was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases