HARRIS v. ZEESMAN

No. 83-2425.

445 So.2d 680 (1984)

Thomas HARRIS, Debra Harris, Harris Builders, Inc. and Harris Builders of Palm Beach, Inc., Petitioners, v. Bertha ZEESMAN, As Conservator of the Estate of Isadore Zeesman, Absentee, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 22, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul R. Lipton, North Miami Beach, for petitioners.

Mark S. London of London & Strock, P.A., Hollywood, for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioners, defendants in the trial court, seek a writ of certiorari to test the blanket denial of their motion to stay discovery. They contend that the trial court's ruling constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law because it contravenes the basic principle "that discovery as to the accounting must be deferred until the preliminary issue of the right to the accounting is settled." Charles Sales Corp. v. Rovenger,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases