1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 38 Wn.
  5. 38 Wn. App. 74 (1984)
 

STATE v. DIXON

No. 6300-0-II.

38 Wn. App. 74 (1984)

683 P.2d 1144

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. PETE DEAN DIXON, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

July 3, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert Armstrong III, for appellant (appointed counsel for appeal).

Arthur D. Curtis, Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael R. Foister, Sr., Deputy, for respondent.

PETRICH, C.J.

Defendant Pete Dean Dixon appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, claiming the trial court did not use the proper standard in reviewing his motion. Our review of the record reveals no error, and we affirm.

Defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the second degree as a result of plea bargaining on October 26, 1981. This guilty plea was a "Newton" plea, wherein defendant stated he believed the State could prove...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases