ASSOCIATED TRADE DEVELOPMENT v. CONDOR LINES

No. 83 Civ. 3703 (JFK).

590 F.Supp. 525 (1984)

ASSOCIATED TRADE DEVELOPMENT, INC., d/b/a Transworld Systems, Plaintiff, v. CONDOR LINES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 1, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Rosoff, New York City, for plaintiff.

Boulanger, Finley & Hicks by J. Portis Hicks, New York City, for defendant.


OPINION

KEENAN, District Judge:

Defendant, Condor Lines, Inc. ("Condor"), moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rules 12(b) and 37(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on the grounds that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over defendant, that service of process was insufficient, and that discovery has not been provided as ordered by this Court. Having carefully considered the affidavits and memoranda of law submitted by the parties, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases