Judgment affirmed.
Based on a review of the record, we find defendant's guilt of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In particular, we find that the circumstantial evidence in the present case amply supports the jury's determination that defendant was knowingly in recent possession of the car previously reported stolen (see People v Roman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
