1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 477 A.2d
  5. 477 A.2d 628 (1984)
 

ADAMS v. B & D BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS, INC.

No. 83-001.

477 A.2d 628 (1984)

John T. ADAMS v. B & D BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS, INC., and Maynard C. Persons and Dolores Persons.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

April 27, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keyser, Crowley, Banse, Abell & Facey, Rutland, for plaintiff-appellant.

Stephen Cosgrove, of Corsones & Hansen, Rutland, for defendants-appellees.

Before BILLINGS, C.J., and HILL, UNDERWOOD, PECK and GIBSON, JJ.

PECK, Justice.

Plaintiff, John T. Adams, appeals the dismissal of his suit against co-defendant Dolores Persons by the Rutland Superior Court.

The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the notice provision of 9A V.S.A. § 9-504(3) of the Vermont Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) requires actual or constructive notice to debtors to validate a sale of collateral after default on a loan obligation. On the facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases