Judgment affirmed.
Defendant's claim that his sentence is excessive lacks merit. The sentencing court was confronted, on one hand, with the defendant, a habitual criminal, and, on the other, with his codefendant, for whom the robbery appeared to be entirely out of character in view of his otherwise relatively solid background. Under the circumstances, the court was clearly justified in imposing the minimum sentence on the codefendant, while giving defendant close...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
