STATE v. PEARSON

80-10-31; CA A21240.

686 P.2d 411 (1984)

69 Or.App. 211

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. James C. PEARSON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Resubmitted May 2, 1984.

Decided July 18, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Noonan, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Winfree & Noonan, Portland.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.


Resubmitted In Banc May 2, 1984.

BUTTLER, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction under ORS 475.9921 for possession of a controlled substance. He assigns as error the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence gathered during a search of his residence and the surrounding premises.2

During the hearing on defendant's motion to suppress, the state called two principal witnesses, officers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases