RUDOLF v. RUDOLF

No. C3-83-590.

348 N.W.2d 740 (1984)

In Re the Marriage of John H. RUDOLF, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, v. Dolores M. RUDOLF, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 18, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack S. Jaycox, Bloomington, for appellant.

Patrick J. O'Meara, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


SIMONETT, Justice.

We decide that the full faith and credit clause does not preclude Minnesota from modifying future alimony installments in a Nevada divorce decree, and we reverse the trial court's contrary ruling and remand.

In November 1965, after 12 years of marriage, a valid divorce decree was entered in Nevada divorcing John and Dolores Rudolf. The decree required, among other things, that John pay Dolores...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases