1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 98 N.J.
  5. 98 N.J. 9 (1984)
 

MATTER OF KAZLOW

98 N.J. 9 (1984)

483 A.2d 397

IN THE MATTER OF THEODORE J. KAZLOW, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

October 25, 1983.

Decided November 9, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Johnson, Jr., Director, Office of Attorney Ethics, and Michael L. Park argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board.

James S. Webb and Matthew R. McCrink argued the cause for respondent (McCrink, Nelson & Kehler, attorneys; Matthew R. McCrink and Mark W. Ford, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding against respondent, Theodore J. Kazlow, arises out of two complaints filed by the District I Ethics Committee (Committee), identified as the Karwick and Crandley matters.

In the Crandley matter, the Committee found that respondent had committed unethical conduct by misrepresenting himself as a fully licensed attorney in violation of R. 1:21-3. The Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) found that the record not only...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases