DAY v. PANOS

No. 18920.

676 P.2d 403 (1984)

Daniel S. DAY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Jim PANOS and Roxanne Panos, Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of Utah.

January 17, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott R. Wangsgard, West Valley City, for plaintiff and appellant.

F. Robert Bayle, Salt Lake City, for defendants and respondents.


DURHAM, Justice:

This is an appeal from the denial of the plaintiff's motion for a new trial under Utah R.Civ.P. 59(a)(2) and (5). Because we find the verdict is a "chance" verdict in violation of Rule 59(a)(2), we reverse the trial court's denial of the motion for a new trial. We do not, therefore, reach the question of whether a new trial is warranted under Rule 59(a)(5).

In the original action, a dog bite case, the jury's verdict attributed 74% of the negligence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases