D'AURIZIO v. RAIL CORP.


129 Misc.2d 949 (1984)

Amedeo D'Aurizio, Plaintiff, v. Consolidated Rail Corporation et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

On Reargument, September 4, 1985


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Siris and James M. Keneally for defendants. Richard M. Malty for plaintiff.


BURTON S. SHERMAN, J.

Defendants, Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (AT & SF), move for partial summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's second and fifth causes of action.

The plaintiff's second and fifth causes of action seek money damages for two separate shipments of grapes which allegedly became spoiled on the defendants' railroads while in transit from California to Niagara...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases