I.A.M. NAT. PENSION FUND v. ALLIED CORP.

Civ. A. Nos. 82-1624, 84-1609.

596 F.Supp. 481 (1984)

I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND, BENEFIT PLAN A, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALLIED CORPORATION, Defendant. ALLIED CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND, BENEFIT PLAN A, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

October 31, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert T. Osgood, Joseph Martocci, Denis F. Gordon and David M. Ermer, Washington, D.C., for I.A.M. Nat. Pension Fund, petitioner.

A. Neal Barkus and Mary Ann Geeker Hunton & Williams, Washington, D.C., for Allied Corp.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN GARRETT PENN, District Judge.

The I.A.M. National Pension Fund Benefit Plan A (the Fund) filed Civil Action 82-1624 in June 1982 in order to collect a withdrawal liability imposed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (MPPAA), 29 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq., from the Allied Chemical Corporation ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases