BABCOCK, Judge.
This appeal arises out of a Crim.P. 35 motion. Defendant, Charles Baker, does not appeal the denial of his motion, but contends that the trial court entered an illegal sentence when it sua sponte ordered that service of his sentence commence on the date of the ruling upon the motion. We reverse and remand for correction of the sentence and mittimus.
In April 1980, defendant was convicted of theft. On August 18, 1980, defendant was sentenced...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
