O'QUINN v. HAAS INV. CO., INC.

No. 83-960.

458 So.2d 612 (1984)

Stanley E. O'QUINN, et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HAAS INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

November 7, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laborde & Lafargue, David Lafargue, Marksville, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Bennett, Marksville, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GUIDRY, STOKER and YELVERTON, JJ.


YELVERTON, Judge.

Haas Investment Company, Inc., the loser in consolidated possessory and damages actions, appeals the judgment arguing that the evidence was insufficient to prove the elements of a possessory action, and further urging that damage awards for mental anguish are not allowable in a case of disturbance of possession of an immovable. Appellant also complains of the amounts of the awards, and the plaintiffs-appellees, two brothers O'Quinn and their wives...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases