1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 680 P.2d
  5. 680 P.2d 389 (1984)
 

EDMONDS v. POLLOCK ENTERPRISES

No. A8105-03110; CA A27597.

680 P.2d 389 (1984)

67 Or.App. 798

Douglas EDMONDS and Barbara Edmonds, Appellants, v. POLLOCK ENTERPRISES, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Dba Rose City Speedway; Theodore A. Pollock, Individually, and Dba Pollock Motors; National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc., a Florida Corporation; Competitors Liaison Bureau of Nascar, Inc., a Florida Corporation; W.G.S., Inc., an Oregon Corporation; William Morrison, Individually and Dba Bill Morrison Ambulance Service; Northwest Pushcar, an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation; James Blomgren, and K & K Insurance Agency, Inc., an Indiana Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 18, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Noreen K. Saltveit, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellants.

I. Franklin Hunsaker, Portland, argued the cause for respondents Pollock Enterprises, Inc., an Oregon corporation, dba Rose City Speedway; Theodore A. Pollock, individually, and dba Pollock Motors; National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc., a Florida corporation; Competitors Liaison Bureau of NASCAR, Inc., a Florida corporation; W.G.S., Inc., an Oregon corporation; Northwest Pushcar, an Oregon non-profit corporation; James Blomgren, and K & K Insurance Agency, Inc., an Indiana corporation. With him on the brief were Stephen F. English, Danford E. Lloyd Bickmore, and Bullivant, Wright, Leedy, Johnson, Pendergrass & Hoffman, Portland.

Michael A. Lehner, Portland, argued the cause for respondents William Morrison, individually and dba Bill Morrison, Ambulance

Service. With him on the brief was Mitchell, Lang & Smith, Portland.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendants in this action for damages arising out of an accident which occurred while husband was competing in a stock car race. The issue is whether the trial court correctly concluded that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that defendants were entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. ORCP 47 C. We review the record in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases