BLOUNT v. BLOUNT

No. 8426DC23.

323 S.E.2d 738 (1984)

Jean Wright BLOUNT v. Marvin K. BLOUNT, Jr.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 28, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James, McElroy & Diehl by William K. Diehl, Jr., and Katherine S. Holliday, Charlotte, for plaintiff.

Hunter, Wharton & Howell by John V. Hunter, III, Raleigh, and Kennedy, Covington, Lobdell and Hickman by Richard D. Stephens, Charlotte, for defendant.


EAGLES, Judge.

At the outset we note that plaintiff's brief violates Rule 28(b)(5) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure by omitting reference to assignments of error and exceptions pertinent to the questions presented in the argument as required. Despite the procedural defects of plaintiff's brief, we choose to exercise our discretion under Rule 2, in order to consider the case on its merits.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases