STATE v. TENGAN

Nos. 9151, 9311.

691 P.2d 365 (1984)

STATE of Hawaii, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne Taro TENGAN, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of Hawaii, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenn Ichiro AKITA, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

Reconsideration Denied December 7, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory K. Tanaka, Deputy Public Defender, Honolulu, for appellant Tengan.

Lynn L. Hodgson, Deputy Pros. Atty., Honolulu (Arthur E. Ross, Honolulu, on the brief), for appellee State of Hawaii.

Charles S. Gerdes, Honolulu, on the briefs for appellant Akita.

Before LUM, C.J., and NAKAMURA, PADGETT, HAYASHI and WAKATSUKI, JJ.


NAKAMURA, Justice.

A State agency must follow the Administrative Procedure Act, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) Chapter 91, when it acts in a rule-making capacity. Town v. Land Use Commission, 55 Haw. 538, 545, 524 P.2d 84, 89, reh. denied, 55 Haw. 677 (1974). In these appeals, Defendants Wayne Taro Tengan and Glenn Ichiro Akita challenge the use of the Intoxilyzer 4011AS (the Intoxilyzer), a breath-testing device, to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases