1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 468 N.E.2d
  5. 468 N.E.2d 587 (1984)
 

TOWN OF ROME CITY v. KING

No. 3-384A84.

468 N.E.2d 587 (1984)

TOWN OF ROME CITY, Fred Kimmerly, Walter Mossman, Estil A. Ritchie, Appellants (Defendants below), v. Kenneth A. KING and Mary Louise King, Appellees (Plaintiff below).

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District.

September 27, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael M. Yoder, Emerick & Diggins, Kendallville, C. Susan Glick, LaGrange, for appellants.

David L. King, King & King, Kendallville, for appellees.

STATON, Presiding Judge.

The Kings brought an action against Rome City seeking enforcement of a judgment previously entered in a nuisance suit. Rome City argued that it had complied with the judgment which had been modified by our Court in Town of Rome City v. King (1983), Ind. App., 450 N.E.2d 72. The trial court ruled against Rome City and enforced the previous judgment. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases