ON MOTION TO REARGUE
PECK, Justice.
Subsequent to the filing of the opinion in this case, defendant filed a timely motion to reargue. V.R.A.P. 40. He contends that the Court "entirely misconceives the nature of the case and ignores relevant precedent." We disagree with defendant's analysis of the opinion and of its effect in relation to the cases cited in his motion.
We have, however, recalled the opinion and redrafted
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.