PURTLE, Justice.
Appellant was convicted under the "Omnibus DWI Act" [Ark.Stat.Ann. §§ 75-1031.1; 75-1045; 75-2501 through 75-2514 (Supp.1983) ]. On appeal he challenges the Act and the evidence in this case. The four points argued on appeal are: (1) the Act violates the separation of powers doctrine; (2) the Act violates due process by failure to give notice of proscribed conduct; (3) the evidence was insufficient; and (4) the court erred in allowing the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.