¶ In the appeal from his conviction for criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, defendant contends that Supreme Court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence that was obtained as a result of an entry upon his property by the arresting officer shortly after 5:30 A.M. on May 1, 1983. The officer was the only witness at the suppression hearing. He testified that at 5:30 A.M., while on patrol, he received a radio message reporting the theft...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
