1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 686 P.2d
  5. 686 P.2d 358 (1984)
 

IN RE GILLIS

82-81, SC S30292.

686 P.2d 358 (1984)

297 Or. 493

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of James M. GILLIS, Accused. In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Kurt Carstens, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided July 31, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Roseta, Eugene, argued the cause for accused Gillis. With him on the brief was Flinn, Brown & Roseta, Eugene.

Kurt Carstens, pro se.

Donald W. Green, III, Portland, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief was J. Phillip Holcomb, Portland.

PER CURIAM.

In this case two attorneys are charged with violating DR 7-110(B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility, which, in pertinent part, provides:

"In an adversary proceeding, a lawyer shall not communicate, or cause another to communicate, as to the merits of the cause with a judge or an official before whom the proceeding is pending, except: "(1) In the course of official proceedings in the cause. "* * * "(4) As...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases