1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 162 Cal.App.3d
  5. 162 Cal.App.3d 877 (1984)
 

QUIGLEY v. PET, INC.

Docket No. F000080.

162 Cal.App.3d 877 (1984)

208 Cal. Rptr. 394

WAYNE QUIGLEY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PET, INCORPORATED, Defendant and Appellant; ED PHIPPEN et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

November 28, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Stockton & Schrimp, Cleveland J. Stockton and James L. Sadler for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Stumbos & Mason, Horvitz & Greines, Horvitz & Levy, Ellis J. Horvitz and Gideon Kanner for Defendant and Appellant and for Defendants and Respondents.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.1]

OPINION

WOOLPERT, J.

In this case, the plaintiffs have recovered substantial contract and tort damages arising from defendant's bad faith activity in protesting contract terms. The case was tried and an appeal filed before the Supreme Court decided Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases