1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 686 P.2d
  5. 686 P.2d 350 (1984)
 

IN RE BISHOP

OSB 82-51, SC 30282.

686 P.2d 350 (1984)

297 Or. 479

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Christopher A. BISHOP, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided July 24, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig S. White, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for accused.

Gary L. Tyler, Portland, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief were Charles D. Ruttan and Dunn, Carney, Allen, Higgins & Tongue, Portland.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding concerns various aspects of the Disciplinary Rules contained in the Code of Professional Responsibility for effecting the admonition of Canon 5: "A Lawyer Should Exercise Independent Professional Judgment on Behalf of a Client." The complaint of the Oregon State Bar is in three causes. All causes arise out of the accused's dealings with Mrs. Hartmann. The specific charges of unethical conduct are more easily understood against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases