CARR v. AFSD

No. 5-1401-MYE593-8; CA A27560.

676 P.2d 359 (1984)

66 Or.App. 830

Sherry L. CARR, Petitioner, v. ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION of the State of Oregon, and Keith Putman, Administrator, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 8, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amy Veranth, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

William F. Nessly, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and WARDEN and YOUNG, JJ.


GILLETTE, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner appeals an order of the Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD) upholding the termination of her General Assistance (GA) benefits. The hearings officer concluded that petitioner had failed to document a condition of unemployability and was for that reason ineligible for further GA benefits.1 Because the order fails to demonstrate a rational nexus between its findings of fact and conclusion of law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases