ANTIEL v. V.W.E. INVESTMENTS

No. C6-84-822.

353 N.W.2d 681 (1984)

Raymond F. ANTIEL, et al., Appellants, v. V.W.E. INVESTMENTS, Vorwerk Investments, its general partner, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 28, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ann E. Barclay, William M. Mahlum, P.A., St. Paul, for appellants.

Reid J. Hansen, McMenomy, Sheldon, Dusich & Hansen, Rosemount, for respondents.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and FOLEY and WOZNIAK, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellants appeal the trial court's order dismissing the complaint against defendants Richard Vorwerk and Russell Vorwerk individually and as general and limited partners for lack of personal jurisdiction. The order was based upon insufficient service of process. We affirm.

FACTS

Plaintiffs sued defendants on contract and fraud claims in connection with real...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases