1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 100 A.D.2d
  5. 100 A.D.2d 934 (1984)
 

WYKAGYL AGENCY, INC. v. ROTHSCHILD

100 A.D.2d 934 (1984)

Wykagyl Agency, Inc., Appellant, v. Abraham Rothschild et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 23, 1984

¶ Order affirmed, with costs.

¶ A plaintiff seeking to recover real estate brokerage fees in an unclosed transaction must establish that he or she has procured a prospect who has reached agreement with the seller on essential terms and is ready, willing and able to perform (see Biskind and Barasch, Law of Real Estate Brokers, § 99.01; Houlihan Parnes Realtors v Gazivoda, 100 A.D.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases