LONGBRANCH WATER HOLE v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION

No. 83-T-27; CA A29439.

679 P.2d 350 (1984)

67 Or.App. 700

In the matter of the Deficiency Assessment of LONGBRANCH WATER HOLE, Bernice B. Kowaleski, Dba, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 11, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leigh E. Schwarz, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on brief was Richard G. Helzer, Portland.

Philip Schradle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and JOSEPH, C.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a referee's decision upholding an unemployment compensation tax deficiency assessment. We have examined petitioner's claims concerning the various dancers whose wages are at issue here. As explained in The Ponderosa Inn, Inc. v. Emp. Div., 63 Or.App. 183, 663 P.2d 1291 (1983), however, we shall not detail the facts here. We hold that, under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases